Hawaii Holomua, Volume III, Number 105, 5 May 1894 Edition 02 — Page 3 Advertisements Column 2 [ADVERTISEMENT]

i. Mc!myy^e IMPORTERS;aNDDEALERS^TN Grroceries, Provisions AXI) Feed, EAST CORNER FORT A KING;STS. New Goods Rcc'd By every P;icket fix>ra the Eastern States an.l Ecrope. Fresh Ca!ifornia !’ro*!aoe bv every steamer. All orJer? f i thfullv atten.leil b>, «ml Go>xla delivered to anv part of the city FREE OF CUARGE. Is! m.l Or.lers Solieite*l. Sat sh.ction Guaranteetl. Post OiTice l»ox N *. 14ō. Te!ei>hone Nn. 9L

Haw.-m.in Hanlw»r>* Co. rs DL. Naone et al. Poter»'u for plaintirf: Kinney-Mag.>on tor defendaut. W. A. Kinney, *drainiskr*tor, vs. K K. Pii. trover Kinney for p!aintitf. PiH*poe for defeudaut. D L. Kalawaia v» L. A. Andrews. t»vspass. Api'eal frmn Honolnln Distriet Court C. W , Asbford for plaintirf. J. K Apio v3 L A Andrews; ! trespass. Ap}>eal from Hooolnlu District Court. C. W. Ashford for plaintitf. Jessie T. N ione vs. L A. Audrews; caso. V V. Ashford for plaiutitf. Jobn R Silva vs. J. W. Knaimokn; trespass on the case. Davidson for plaiutitf; W. R. Castle for defendant. Olowaln Sug.»r Co. vs. S. Kaa|lawa; ejectment. Hatch for ■ plaiutilf; Kinney for defendant. Pipi et nl. vs. McCand!ess Brotliers; dimnges. Carter »t Carter for defeudant. Gaspar Sylva vs. Mulia Kaia et al.; ejectment. Hartwell for plaintitf; C. W. Ashford for defendant. Gaspar Sylva vs Kalei et a!.. ejectmeut: HaHwell for pl 'intiff Gispar Sylva vs. Harriet Sqnires et al.; ejectmont Hartwell for pluiutitf Gaspar Sylva vs. Moknhia et al.; ejectraeut. llartwell for plaintiff. Capt. Wm. Davies, INTER-ISLAND PIL0T f OK Any Port or Lamling in th«* Hawalian Islanda Inqnire at o®ce ot .T. 8. Walkkk over Spreckel’s Bc.nk. feb DAINIPPON Hotel street (Arlington Block.) Tho aliowe Su>re hn* i anoir.Tr St>leudid 1:in# ce A APAN ESE jhlLK. Y ANCY jjOODS, Per S. S. “China.” l —C0MPE13IN<* —• BEAUT1FUL SILK ( DAN CRAPE, Dre«s Oowl* in «II »ha<!e, plain *nd tigt»re<!. Cashions, T«h!e CoTere, B«<!CoTer«, Ooirns Che:mse*, Sha*l». ;|Silk Crape Hainhow Silks, AD Colors F*nrT Draperi«\ !embboidebed HAHDXEECH1EFS, Doillies, Sc«rfis, 8>;hen, J«ckeU, C«p«, Etc., £tc. NOVELTIES: The rrice«of theee Good» will a«tonnh you inclading ELEGANT SILK KIM0N08! Il«nd«onie Cig«rette C ws. Pm Ca«hion«, Silk Te* Co«aies, LlRi;E 15D8X1LL J PJSE8E BU*M Silk Uivhrel>d«. ligbt bat strong; Chair SndiU««. SUk; E*mboo Blin<U, ti:ied with pullej«; 8dk Lamp Shadea, nerr «tjl«. JAr»XESE rrom *3 l>, LiKlīE JlPl5ESC UXBBELLIM C«n be Sat *tth Pole In lh« groand. nioe tjr Pvcuica or Laa:U«oot of door», tbej axa be openad oot or a*ed u a tenu CUTT()N CRAPES IN GREAT VARIETY >• 1 LJf'Io-5pecūoa Beepoctfailj IaTit«d. [MBS. J- P. P. OOLLIOO. i Prgjnieiiw<.

Anpo\l fr H nolala D >trict C‘*urt. K iului for defendaut. Provision»l Governoient vs. Kthan;tnai; m;iticions injnry. Appeal fro;u Uonoluln Di>trict Coart. K ihookino for defeiulAnt. rrovisionnl Governinent vs. Kilnakini; 1 qnor s«?lling with<mt I eense. Appe.il fmru Honolal i Di>trict Conrt. K»ulia for defendmt. FOREIGN JrUY —CIVIL. C itherine 1> itcbelor vs. C. 1). Wilson. niHrsliHl; trespass. C M. \shford-Creighton for plnintiff; H itcu-Curter <fc C;irter for defendant. H. Wilgeroth vs. Ewa Planta tion Cotnt)any; d«mtge; C. W A:<sbfnrd for plaintitf; Castle l'or defendant. Tlioiuas Nott vs. C. T. Ouliek. guardian; assumpsit. C. W. Ash£ord for plaintiff; Kiuuev for defend,ant. Ing Choi vs. Ah Pong et al.. nssninpsit. Cast|e for plaintiff; P» terson for defendants. \J'. V. Ashford vs. ArthnrJohn stoue; assumpsit Appeal from Ho uohilu Distnct Conrt: plaiutiff in person. Magoon for ilefendaatappellanl. C. A. Jlrown vs. Bulletin PubIishing Cotopany; trespass on caso. Hatch for plaiutiff; C. W. Ashford for defeudaut. HAWAIIAN JURt—CIML. Maria Kaanaana vs. Keahi et ah; ejectinent. C. W Ashford for plaintiff; Kinney-Magoon for defeudants. C.io H Newt?n et nl. vs. S. K .ale et al.; ejectmeut. Kinney for plaiutifts; Kane for defendants. n re will of Charlotte A<lams; probate nppeal. C. Brown f<>r prop<>nent; Uartwell-C. . Ashford for contestants-appeIlant. Lacy Kila vs. S. K. Kila; ejectment Aehi for ciefeud.ant. ?d. laukea et a!. vs. W. H. Bumniings; case. Kmlakon for plaintitis; Aehi for de{eudaut. In re Estate of A. Akahi; petition to revuke probato nf will. Appeal from order dismissing petition. Poepoe for petitionerappellanl; Hatch-C. W. Asbford forTrustee» B P. Bishop Estute. Kahaknakoi vs. Hawaiian Gnvernment; ejectment. Aehi-Ka-hookano for plaintiff; Hart\vellHatch for defeudant. Annie L. Uhikou vs. Qneen Dowager Kapiolani; nssumpsit. W K. Castle for plaiutift Hutch for defeudant. Kaaukai Kelley vs. 'Caroline Aniu; trespass on the case. Kaulia for pla ntiff; Aehi for defenddiit. MIXED JL’BY. Talula L. Hayselden vs. Wahineaea; ejectment. C. W. Asbfurd for j»laintiff; Nawahi for defondant. Ho Snn vs. Kukekakaulani; ejectment. C. W Ashfunl-John-son for pla.ntift"; Mugoun for dcJ*endaut. Jniia S Riceetal vs Jonathau S{H>oner; ejectraeut. Kinney tor pl,»miitfs, Carter ami Carter £or defend.iut. J. I. Dowsett vs. Maukeala et a! ; ejectmenff. C Brown for plaintig; C. W. Ashfurd for difeud.»nts. Frink Tellts vs. Albert and Si.mh Trjsk; replevin. Appeul fruai Houolalu D<strict Coart. C. W. Ashford for plaintiffappellanl: Rusa for defendant. James H.trvest vs. C H. Latber ©t «I.; ejectment. Poepoe for plaintift‘;C. Brown for defendants. Asai vs. Heien Kaaakai; damage. Appenl from Koolaalua D strict Coart. Kane for defeu daat- >ppellant. Asai vs. J. Kalili; damage. Appe.il from KooUnloa D>stncl C<mrt. K me fur defendaot-ap pellanh J. E. Gocaes vs. Hawaiian Gize)te Co.; trespass on e isa, C. W. Aa!if<»rd for plaiutiff; W. R. | G-utle tur tkiuu\Uut